9to5Google: “Samsung Galaxy Fold display issues emerge just 48 hours after first outing”

On 9to5Google:

Over the past hour, journalists from The Verge, Bloomberg, and CNBC all shared issues they encountered with the Galaxy Fold review units they received on Monday.
According to Dieter Bohn, a small “bulge” appeared on the crease of the Galaxy Fold that’s “enough to slightly distort the screen.” Besides being able to feel the lump, there are “telltale lines of a broken OLED” after just normal usage by The Verge.

– Abner Li

Once again, this is why Apple is not launching a foldable iPhone: the technology behind Samsung’s Galaxy Fold is neat but it’s not ready for prime time yet. It’s not being the first that really matters, it’s being the best.

Link to the article: https://9to5google.com/2019/04/17/samsung-galaxy-fold-broken/

GNU/Linux doesn’t deserve to be popular on desktop computers, and it’s OK

Don’t get me wrong: GNU/Linux is a great operating system, I use it daily along with macOS and Windows, there are marvelous distributions out there, and it is widely used by companies of all sizes for mission-critical tasks because it is known for its general stability and openness. It even runs on supercomputers. But when it comes to its popularity for the average, day-to-day users, these are the most frequently encountered problems:

  1. Fragmentation – The strength of GNU/Linux is also its weakness: There are plenty of different distributions of GNU/Linux available. Different kernels, different packaging methods, different user interfaces. When you’re an advanced user, having the liberty of choosing, or maybe even creating, an operating system that fits your needs is wonderful. As an average user, this means that there are too many choices, too many compromises to make. On the other side, that computer you saw at the mall earlier was running Windows 10 Home. Period.
  2. Politic – The GNU/Linux philosophy is not all about software. It is also highly political. As a consumer, the holy war between closed and open sourced software is definitely not your primary concern when you want a computer to download movies, browse Facebook and play games during your after-work time and on rainy weekends.
  3. Compatibility – What is the common point between the latest AAA game with dithyrambic reviews and that nice little indie software you saw on Twitter? Chances are that they won’t work out of the box on GNU/Linux. Software editors are targeting the most installed operating system globally, and it happens to be Windows. Same goes with drivers, hardware manufacturers will target Windows first. Cruel. And macOS is no exception.

These are reasonably easy to solve problems, and the solution would be to unite forces behind a common Linux-based operating system packed with open source software that could be considered as the state-of-the-art product that the open source community can build, with different forks for marginal use cases. IMHO, a distribution like Ubuntu from Canonical could fill that void. Unfortunately, it appears that the open vs closed source war is not enough: there are conflicts inside the open source community itself. Revolving around one major distribution seems impossible. The greater good is not the priority, and it’s a shame.

To me, GNU/Linux does not deserve to be popular on the desktop. They had their chance and now the desktop war is over. But it is not a fatality. There is a new playground coming, and it’s just around the corner.

In the Post-PC era, Linux (as a kernel) is the great winner. It powers Google Android, and Google Android powers the vast majority of the smartphones all over the globe. It even runs on televisions, cars and watches. How did Google do that? They took Linux, built their open source operating system around it (AOSP), added their closed source layer (Google Play Services) and pushed it on the market. Smartphone manufacturers and carriers saw the opportunity of jumping into the Android wagon: engineers could create drivers to make Android compatible with their hardware, add preinstalled apps and customize the user interface to the extreme (and I’m stressing the word extreme here). Have an agreement with Google? Your device can also access the proprietary but important stuff, like the Play Store, that your users will expect to find on their smartphone. And at each iteration, the system is getting better and better. Google built the reference Linux-based operating system for mobile devices, and forks exist for different use cases, like building custom ROMs for unsupported devices, running it on x86 computers or focusing on user privacy. And it worked.

So what’s the next big thing? It’s the Internet of Things. Connected cameras. Connected thermostats. Connected plugs. Connected locks. Connected wearable trackers of all kinds. Connected medical implants. They all are collecting data to be stored and analyzed on cloud computing platforms. Even if Linux is a natural candidate to lead this revolution, considering how well it performed in the Post-PC era and after gaining enough flexibility into supporting many hardware platforms, Microsoft, after their Windows Phone debacle in the smartphone market, is preparing its revenge with Windows 10 for IoT. These new connected objects will have to be easy to use, eco-friendly and highly secure to ensure that the customer’s private life is as safe as possible.

The war just begun.

Thoughts on Xserve

As you may or may not know, I manage servers both at work and at home (among other things). I’m currently running ESXi on a HPE ProLiant server at home, hosting several GNU/Linux VMs. In fact, this website is hosted on The Server(TM) as I call it.

As a die-hard Apple fan, I’ve tried Mac OS X OS X macOS Server on several occasions on an old 2009 Mac mini that has been my main computer, a media server and finally a small server. In this order. This machine family is profoundly versatile by nature, and I guess those uses are among the most common out there.

When Apple announced that they retired the Xserve and replaced it with “Server” versions of the Mac mini and the Mac Pro, I was still in high school, still trying to figure out what I would be doing for a living. The Xserve was as much as a curiosity as it was abstract to the end users like I used to be. Now that I’m in that wonderful world of technologies, I sometimes think about the Xserve.

Sure, it looked like a server that you could see in those Shutterstock photos of server rooms (with an Apple logo, ok ok). Maybe it wasn’t the sexiest computer Apple has ever made, but after using macOS Server, and comparing it to Windows Server and GNU/Linux server-oriented distributions, I guess that it was more about the user’s (or in this case, the administrator’s) experience than the external design, and allowing him to manage it with no to minimal effort.

Servers can be frustrating, and somewhat disturbing. Apple’s approach when they bring something to the market is easy to understand: take a concept, improve it, make it desirable and then release it. Always put the customer first. Always simplify his experience with the product. Hide the technology behind the product. This is Apple’s DNA: don’t be the first, be the best. And IMHO, there is still a need for a Xserve-like machine to this day that could benefit from this DNA:

  • There are people in startups, small and even medium companies out there that use Apple computers as their work machines. They could enjoy a real server that is dead simple to administer for things like LDAP for centralized authentication and Backups, because if you don’t do backups you don’t deserve a computer. And Time Machine makes it easy and automatic. All they want is a machine with enterprise-grade capabilities, a reasonable learning curve and designed with security in mind ;
  • Apple provides a MDM solution through macOS Server’s Profile Manager. In medium to large companies that have a fleet of iPhones and/or iPads, having an in-house MDM provided directly by Apple is a plus. But the lack of an easily rackable server with redundant power supplies and a dedicated lights-out management system (like iLO in the HPE terminology) is a no-no ;
  • There are advanced customers that want a “local iCloud”, like ownCloud, because they want to manage the security of their data by themselves while having the liberty of accessing the before-mentioned data from virtually anywhere. A dedicated server with everything required to run a local instance of iCloud would satisfy their needs.

Unfortunately, Apple is sending some frightening signals. The server configurations of the Mac mini and the Mac Pro no longer exist, and they are removing advanced features of macOS Server like DHCP, DNS and LDAP. At this point, they should rename macOS Server to Apple Configurator Pro or whatever (calling something “Pro” is so in today) and go with it.

Maybe the new modular Mac Pro will be our savior. Wait and see.

Hi all!

This is my first post… Nothing important. Feel free to comment and let me know what you think of this website!